On Wednesday 11 February 2009, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> [090126 15:23]: > > On Sunday 18 January 2009, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > > > #if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP730) && \ > > > > > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP15XX) && \ > > > > > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX) && \ > > > > > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX) && \ > > > > > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP34XX) > > > > > #error "Power management for this processor not implemented yet" > > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > I didn't realize anyone outside of TI had their hands > > > > on OMAP4 chips yet. :) > > > > > > Might be worth looking what it would take to make dummy CONFIG_PM > > > compile in mainline for mach-omap2. > > > > This (against mainline) makes build+link work ... > > I'll add it to omap-fixes. Dave, can you please reply with your SOB? Special offer, today only ... take your pick: Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sonofabitch: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :) > > Thanks, > > Tony > > > > --- > > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/pm.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/pm.h > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/pm.h > > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ > > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP15XX) && \ > > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX) && \ > > !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX) > > -#error "Power management for this processor not implemented yet" > > +#warning "Power management for this processor not implemented yet" > > #endif > > > > #ifndef __ASSEMBLER__ > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
