Darren Etheridge <detheridge@xxxxxx> wrote on Tue [2014-May-06 14:58:04 -0500]:
> Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote on Tue [2014-May-06 14:46:10 -0500]:
> > On 05/06/2014 02:40 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:26:17PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> > >> This adds the irq crossbar device node.
> > >>
> > >> There is a IRQ crossbar device in the soc, which
> > >> maps the irq requests from the peripherals to the
> > >> mpu interrupt controller's inputs. The Peripheral irq
> > >> requests are connected to only one crossbar
> > >> input and the output of the crossbar is connected to only one
> > >> controller's input line. The crossbar device is used to map
> > >> a peripheral input to a free mpu's interrupt controller line.
> > >>
> > >> Cc: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
> > >> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx>
> > >> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@xxxxxx>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
> > >> ---
> > >> [V5] Rebased on top of 3.15-rc4 and corrected the
> > >> irqs-reserved list
> > >>
> > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> > >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> > >> index 149b550..0274a86 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> > >> @@ -790,6 +790,14 @@
> > >> status = "disabled";
> > >> };
> > >> };
> > >> +
> > >> + crossbar_mpu: crossbar@4a020000 {
> > >
> > > shouldn't this be "status = disabled"; so that boards enable this
> > > on-demand ??
> > >
> > It cannot be and does not need to be. crossbar is an SoC feature. by
> > defining crossbar, the IRQ numbers we provide in DTS now becomes
> > crossbar numbers which get mapped to GIC interrupt numbers dynamically.
> >
> > further crossbar is not a board feature. it is as ingrained in DRA7
> > behavior as GIC is. we are fortunate that we have some default mapping
> > of crossbar that allows the current peripherals to work, with this
> > support, we dont have to depend any longer on "we are lucky that is
> > mapped".
> >
> > That said, in hindsight, patch #1 and 2 should be squashed IMHO. else
> > we have a bisectability problem here.
> >
> Yes the bisectability problem is completely true - I was just testing
> that as your email came in. In fact I think all three patches need to
> be squashed into one, I can't boot the dra7-EVM unless I have all three
> patches applied.
>
Or I just tried reordering, so patch 3/3 becomes patch 1 and then squash
patch 1/3 and patch 2/3 together to form patch 2. That seems to at
least let the kernel boot to completion.
Darren
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
