Hi Grant, On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 23:54:37 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> > I also don't like that it tries to set up every clock, but there is no >>>> > guarantee that the driver will even use it. I would rather see this >>>> > behaviour linked into the function that obtains the clock at driver >>>> > .probe() time. That way it can handle deferred probe correctly and it >>>> > only sets up clocks that are actually used by the driver. >>>> >>>> Not every clock. Only the clocks that are advertised by the clock driver as >>>> being suitable for runtime_pm management. These are typically module >>>> clocks, that must be enabled for the module to work. The driver doesn't >>>> always want to handle these explicitly. >>> >>> Help me out here becasue I don't understand how that works with this >>> patch set. From my, admittedly naive, reading it looks like the setup is >>> being done at device creation time, but if the driver (or module) gets >>> to declare which clocks need to be enabled in order to work, then that >>> information is not available at device creation time. >> >> Setup is indeed done at registration time. Note the check calling >> clk_may_runtime_pm(), which is introduced in "[PATCH/RFC 1/4] clk: Add >> CLK_RUNTIME_PM and clk_may_runtime_pm()". >> >> Clock drivers are initialized much earlier, so they can set the CLK_RUNTIME_PM >> flag for suitable clocks before platform devices are created from DT, cfr. the >> example for shmobile MSTP clocks in "[PATCH/RFC 4/4] clk: shmobile: mstp: >> Set CLK_RUNTIME_PM flag". > > This is where I have issue. You're *assuming* clock drivers are > initialized much earlier. That is not guaranteed. It is perfectly > valid for clocks to be set up by a normal device driver, just like for > interrupt controllers or gpio controllers. OK, I didn't know that. In that case, nothing happens, and everything works like before. So the drivers still have to take care of the clocks themselves. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html