On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Andreas Fenkart <afenkart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -2201,11 +2346,16 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> pm_runtime_get_sync(host->dev);
>
> if (!(host->mmc->pm_flags & MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER)) {
> - omap_hsmmc_disable_irq(host);
> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, 0);
> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE, 0);
> + OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, STAT, STAT_CLEAR);
> OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, HCTL,
> OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, HCTL) & ~SDBP);
> }
>
> + if (host->wake_irq && !(host->mmc->pm_flags & MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ))
> + disable_irq(host->wake_irq);
> +
> if (host->dbclk)
> clk_disable_unprepare(host->dbclk);
>
> @@ -2231,6 +2381,9 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> omap_hsmmc_protect_card(host);
>
> + if (host->wake_irq & !(host->mmc->pm_flags & MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ))
> + enable_irq(host->wake_irq);
> +
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(host->dev);
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(host->dev);
> return 0;
Maybe I misunderstand something here but shouldn't
disable_irq/enable_irq be swapped here?
regards
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
