* Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [140424 11:29]: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:44:59AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > omap2_dpll_round_rate() doesn't actually round the given rate, even if > > the name and the description so hints. Instead it only tries to find an > > exact rate match, or if that fails, return ~0 as an error. > > > > What this basically means is that the user of the clock needs to know > > what rates the dpll can support, which obviously isn't right. > > > > This patch adds a simple method of rounding: during the iteration, the > > code keeps track of the closest rate match. If no exact match is found, > > the closest is returned. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> > > Tony, looks like this patch was lost. Are you taking it during the -rc ? Would like to hear what Paul thinks of the updated patch suggested by Tomi first. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
