Op 3 feb 2009, om 12:37 heeft Gadiyar, Anand het volgende geschreven:
-----Original Message----- From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:05 PM To: Remith Ravi Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: USB and SD performance issue Op 3 feb 2009, om 12:16 heeft Remith Ravi het volgende geschreven:Hello, Recently I have done a performance comparison of OMAP3 'USBOTG Host'and 'SD' drivers on different Linux Kernels. The performance of latest git kernel is less comparing to2.6.22 TIkernel. Could some one please explain me what cause this performance difference? The performance is calculated by doing data transfer between RAM and the storage device (using 'time' command). The performance details are given below. 1) 2.6.29-rc2 kernel USB OTG (Host) Read (4.2 MB/s) Write(2.6 MB/s)SD Card Read (3.88 MB/s)Write (3.1 MB/s)2) 2.6.28 kernel USB OTG (Host) error error SD Card Read (4.2 MB/s)Write (3.27 MB/s)3) 2.6.22 TI kernel USB OTG (Host) Read (5.4MB/s) Write(6.14MB/s)SD Card Read (6.7MB/s) Write (6.43MB/s)I get this with 2.6.28: root@omap3evm:~# hdparm -t /dev/mmcblk0 /dev/mmcblk0: Timing buffered disk reads: 42 MB in 3.10 seconds = 13.53 MB/sec root@beagleboard:~# hdparm -t /dev/mmcblk0 /dev/mmcblk0: Timing buffered disk reads: 44 MB in 3.13 seconds = 14.04 MB/sec regards, KoenWhat does `hdparm -tT /dev/mmcblk0` give?
root@beagleboard:~# hdparm -tT /dev/mmcblk0 /dev/mmcblk0: Timing cached reads: 240 MB in 2.01 seconds = 119.32 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 42 MB in 3.01 seconds = 13.97 MB/sec root@omap3evm:~# hdparm -tT /dev/mmcblk0 /dev/mmcblk0: Timing cached reads: 300 MB in 2.00 seconds = 149.83 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 42 MB in 3.17 seconds = 13.23 MB/secWhich is misleading, since -T tests the bandwidth or your RAM, which in my case is limited since both machines are displaying a stream from a webcam attached to USB in X11, so the overlays and framebuffers are stealing a large part of the bw. Killing the screensaver on the EVM gave me 35MB/s 'back' :)
regards, Koen
- Anand
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: Dit deel van het bericht is digitaal ondertekend