Re: USB and SD performance issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Op 3 feb 2009, om 12:37 heeft Gadiyar, Anand het volgende geschreven:



-----Original Message-----
From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:05 PM
To: Remith Ravi
Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: USB and SD performance issue


Op 3 feb 2009, om 12:16 heeft Remith Ravi het volgende geschreven:

Hello,

Recently I have done a performance comparison of OMAP3 'USB
OTG Host'
and 'SD' drivers on different Linux Kernels.
The performance of latest git kernel is less comparing to
2.6.22 TI
kernel.
Could some one please explain me what cause this performance
difference?

The performance is calculated by doing data transfer between RAM and
the storage device (using 'time' command).

The performance details are given below.

1) 2.6.29-rc2 kernel
USB OTG (Host)         Read (4.2 MB/s)		Write
(2.6 MB/s)	
SD Card                     Read (3.88 MB/s)		
Write (3.1 MB/s)

2) 2.6.28 kernel
USB OTG (Host)         error		                error	
SD Card                     Read  (4.2 MB/s)		
Write (3.27 MB/s)

3) 2.6.22 TI kernel
USB OTG (Host)         Read (5.4MB/s)		Write
(6.14MB/s)	
SD Card                      Read (6.7MB/s)		Write (6.43MB/s)

I get this with 2.6.28:

root@omap3evm:~# hdparm -t /dev/mmcblk0
/dev/mmcblk0:
 Timing buffered disk reads:   42 MB in  3.10 seconds =  13.53 MB/sec

root@beagleboard:~# hdparm -t /dev/mmcblk0
/dev/mmcblk0:
 Timing buffered disk reads:   44 MB in  3.13 seconds =  14.04 MB/sec

regards,

Koen


What does `hdparm -tT /dev/mmcblk0` give?

root@beagleboard:~# hdparm -tT /dev/mmcblk0
/dev/mmcblk0:
 Timing cached reads:   240 MB in  2.01 seconds = 119.32 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:   42 MB in  3.01 seconds =  13.97 MB/sec

root@omap3evm:~# hdparm -tT /dev/mmcblk0
/dev/mmcblk0:
 Timing cached reads:   300 MB in  2.00 seconds = 149.83 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:   42 MB in  3.17 seconds =  13.23 MB/sec

Which is misleading, since -T tests the bandwidth or your RAM, which in my case is limited since both machines are displaying a stream from a webcam attached to USB in X11, so the overlays and framebuffers are stealing a large part of the bw. Killing the screensaver on the EVM gave me 35MB/s 'back' :)

regards,

Koen




- Anand


Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: Dit deel van het bericht is digitaal ondertekend


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux