Re: [PATCH] dma: edma: fix incorrect SG list handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/18/2014 10:28 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 09:14:14AM -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jon,
>>>
>>> On Monday 17 March 2014 06:28 PM, Jon Ringle wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The code to handle any length SG lists calls edma_resume()
>>>>> even before edma_start() is called. This is incorrect
>>>>> because edma_resume() enables edma events on the channel
>>>>> after which CPU (in edma_start) cannot clear posted
>>>>> events by writing to ECR (per the EDMA user's guide).
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of this EDMA transfers fail to start if due
>>>>> to some reason there is a pending EDMA event registered
>>>>> even before EDMA transfers are started. This can happen if
>>>>> an EDMA event is a byproduct of device initialization.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix this by calling edma_resume() only if it is not the
>>>>> first batch of MAX_NR_SG elements.
>>>>>
>>>>> Without this patch, MMC/SD fails to function on DA850 EVM
>>>>> with DMA. The behaviour is triggered by specific IP and
>>>>> this can explain why the issue was not reported before
>>>>> (example with MMC/SD on AM335x).
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested on DA850 EVM and AM335x EVM-SK using MMC/SD card.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v3.12.x+
>>>>> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelf@xxxxxx>
>>>>> Reported-by: Jon Ringle <jringle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Jon, can you please confirm this fixes the issue you
>>>>> reported?
>>>>
>>>> The patch does not apply on linux-3.12 due to changes to the 3 context 
>>>> lines at the start of the hunk.
>>>>
>>>> But, I manually fixed up the code and it does fix the issue  on our AM1808 
>>>> board.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the testing. The patch is meant for latest mainline but based
>>> on what you said, a manual backport to v3.12-stable will be required.
>>>
>>> Can you please reply with a formal Tested-by: ?
>>
>> Tested-by: Jon Ringle <jringle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> where is this patch, somehow am not able to find in my inbox or archives...
> 

I found it archived here:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.davinci/28569

Patch doesn't breaking anything for > MAX_NR_SG list size on AM335x, so
it looks good.

Acked-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@xxxxxx>

Regards,
-Joel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux