* Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> [140305 04:26]: > + George > > Tony, > > On 03/04/2014 06:28 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> [140304 01:17]: > >> Hi Tony, > >> > >> On 03/03/2014 09:02 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> [140303 07:10]: > >>>> Move omap-control binding information to the right location. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti-phy.txt | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/omap-usb.txt | 24 --------------------- > >>>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti-phy.txt > >>>> index 207e14c..41dc132 100644 > >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti-phy.txt > >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti-phy.txt > >>>> @@ -1,5 +1,30 @@ > >>>> TI PHY: DT DOCUMENTATION FOR PHYs in TI PLATFORMs > >>>> > >>>> +OMAP CONTROL PHY > >>>> + > >>>> +Required properties: > >>>> + - compatible: Should be one of > >>>> + "ti,control-phy-otghs" - if it has otghs_control mailbox register as on OMAP4. > >>>> + "ti,control-phy-usb2" - if it has Power down bit in control_dev_conf register > >>>> + e.g. USB2_PHY on OMAP5. > >>>> + "ti,control-phy-pipe3" - if it has DPLL and individual Rx & Tx power control > >>>> + e.g. USB3 PHY and SATA PHY on OMAP5. > >>>> + "ti,control-phy-dra7usb2" - if it has power down register like USB2 PHY on > >>>> + DRA7 platform. > >>>> + "ti,control-phy-am437usb2" - if it has power down register like USB2 PHY on > >>>> + AM437 platform. > >>> > >>> To me it seems that you can leave out all the above. You can set these falgs > >>> flags directly in the driver based on the compatible flag. Then just initialize > >>> the .data in the driver based on the compatible flag. > >> > >> I'm not sure if I got you. A single platform can have different type of phys. > >> > >> e.g. OMAP5 has both usb2 and pipe3 PHYs, > >> DRA7 has both pipe3 and usb2 PHYs, but this usb2 PHY is not compatible with OMAP5 one > >> so we need a new compatible id for that. > >> > >> To add to the woes, the designers were creative enough to make another mutation to > >> the USB2 PHY for AM437x, :( > > > > Oh OK, in that case the compatible flag may not be enough for configuring the > > various instances. > > > >> What do you suggest the compatible ids should look like for these 5 types of PHY control? > >> OTGHS (OMAP4 & 5) > >> USB2 (OMAP5) > >> PIPE3 (OMAP5 & DRA7) > >> USB2x (DRA7) > >> USB2y (AM437) > > > > I think in that case having the various instances fully configurable from > > device tree is OK if you prefer that. But if you wanted to use the > > compatible flag, then you could do something like this: > > > > ti,control-phy-omap4-otghs (assuming same on omap4 & 5) > > ti,control-phy-omap5-usb2 > > ti,control-phy-omap5-pipe3 (assuming same on omap5 & dra7) > > ti,control-phy-dra7-usb2x > > ti,control-phy-am437-usb2y > > ... > > > > Please note that the original bindings were added in v3.13 and I'm just moving the documentation > to the right location. So I don't think we should change the bindings now. OK yeah if the bindings are established you should keep them around. > "ti,control-phy-dra7usb2" and "ti,control-phy-am437usb2" have no users still so we could probably > change those to "ti,control-phy-dra7-usb2" and "ti,control-phy-am437-usb2". > > What do you say? Makes sense to me. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
