On 27/02/14 04:25, Mike Turquette wrote: >> Basically the patch looks good to me, but it might be good to have a >> testing round of sort with this. It can potentially cause regressions on >> multiple boards if the drivers happen to rely on the "broken" clock >> rates. Same for patch #2 which is a copy paste of this one, but only >> impacts TI boards. > > Agreed. I've taken patches #1 & #2 into clk-next. Let's let them stew in > -next for a while and see if anyone's board catches on fire. Thanks. I understand there's a possibility this could break some other driver. I still wish we could get this to 3.14, as this would fix OMAP display subsystem. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
