Hi Benoit, Tony, On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote: > Originally attempted partially in [1], the missing binding were > reported as part of Rob's report in [2]. Would you like me to send this series again since I do not see this in: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git/log/?h=for_3.14/dts patchwork links: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3286051/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3286061/ > > So, here is take two of the series, lacking an standard causes issues > that was fixed such as [3]. Ideally, we should never again introduce a > board file without a exact compatible SoC match. > > I have stayed a bit away from updating board and SoC dts files yet > to look at the direction we'd like to go here. If we feel things are > good, I would gladly try to clean our mess up. > > Nishanth Menon (2): > Documentation: dt: OMAP: explicitly state SoC compatible strings > ARM: OMAP2+: board-generic: update SoC compatibility strings > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c | 7 +++ > 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+) > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2998201/ > [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138378029113665&w=2 > [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3279281/ > > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
