Hi Pekon,
On 06.01.2014 08:40, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> Hello Enric, Nikita, and other OMAP3 users,
>
>>
>> As there were parallel set of patches running between u-boot and kernel.
>> hence, some patch-sets caused regression for OMAP3x platforms when booting
>> using u-boot specifically for ecc-schemes (like BCH4_SW).
>>
>> Hence this patch series fixes those regressions, and tests complete
>> NAND boot sequence for multiple ecc-schemes on AM335x-EVM board.
>> (following configurations are required for building u-boot driver which is
>> compatible to kernel ecclayout for selected ecc-scheme)
>>
>>
>> (BCH8_HW) (HAM1_HW) (HAM1_HW) (HAM1_HW) (UBIFS)
>> ROM ---------> SPL ---------> U-Boot ---------> Kernel ---------> File-System
>>
>> (BCH8_HW) (BCH8_SW) (BCH8_SW) (BCH8_SW) (UBIFS)
>> ROM ---------> SPL ---------> U-Boot ---------> Kernel ---------> File-System
>>
>> (BCH8_HW) (BCH8_HW) (BCH8_HW) (BCH8_HW) (UBIFS)
>> ROM ---------> SPL ---------> U-Boot ---------> Kernel ---------> File-System
>>
>> *Configurations used to build u-boot and kernel for end-to-end NAND boot*
>> +------------+--------------------------------------------+------------------+
>> | ecc-scheme | u-boot/SPL configs | kernel DTS |
>> +------------+--------------------------------------------+------------------+
>> | | | |
>> | HAM1_HW | #define CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_ECCSCHEME \ |ti,nand-ecc-opts= |
>> | | OMAP_ECC_HAM1_CODE_HW | "ham1" |
>> | (1-bit | #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCBYTES 3 | |
>> | Hamming | #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCPOS \ | |
>> | using h/w) | { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, \ | |
>> | | 10, 11, 12 } | |
>> | | (for NAND page-size=2048) | |
>> | | | |
>> +------------+--------------------------------------------+------------------+
>> | | | |
>> | BCH8_SW | #define CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_ECCSCHEME \ |ti,nand-ecc-opts= |
>> | | OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW | "bch8" |
>> |(8-bit BCH | #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCBYTES 13 |(without ELM node)|
>> | using s/w | #define CONFIG_BCH | |
>> |library for | #undef CONFIG_SPL_NAND_AM33XX_BCH | |
>> |for ECC | #define CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SIMPLE | |
>> | error | #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCPOS \ | |
>> |correction) | {2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, \ | |
>> | | 11, 12, 13, 14, \ | |
>> | | 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, \ | |
>> | | 25, 26, 27, 28, \ | |
>> | | 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, \ | |
>> | | 39, 40, 41, 42, \ | |
>> | | 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, \ | |
>> | | 53, 54, 55, 56, } | |
>> | | (for NAND page-size=2048) | |
>> | | #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCSIZE 512 | |
>> | | | |
>> +------------+--------------------------------------------+------------------+
>> | | | |
>> | BCH8_HW | #define CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_ECCSCHEME \ |ti,nand-ecc-opts= |
>> | | OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW | "bch8" |
>> |(8-bit BCH | #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCBYTES 14 | |
>> | using ELM | #define CONFIG_SPL_NAND_AM33XX_BCH |(with ELM node) |
>> | h/w engine | #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCPOS \ |ti,elm-id=<&elm> |
>> |for ECC | {2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, \ | |
>> | error | 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, \ | |
>> |correction) | 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, \ | |
>> | | 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, \ | |
>> | | 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, \ | |
>> | | 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, \ | |
>> | | 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, } | |
>> | | (for NAND page-size=2048) | |
>> | | #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCSIZE 512 | |
>> | | | |
>> +------------+--------------------------------------------+------------------+
>>
>> #* In addition following patches need to be pulled for u-boot:
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-December/168506.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-December/169021.html
>>
>>
>> Test1: flash ubi image from u-boot and boot the kernel
>> U-boot> mw 0x82000000 0xff <u-boot.img size aligned to NAND block boundary>
>> U-boot> fatload mmc 0 0x82000000 u-boot.img
>> U-boot> nand erase <u-boot_offset> <u-boot.img size>
>> U-boot> nand write 0x82000000 <u-boot_offset> <u-boot.img size>
>> U-boot> setenv bootargs 'console=ttyO0,115200n8 noinitrd mem=256M \
>> root=ubi0 rw rootfstype=ubifs ubi.mtd=<mtdpart-of-rootfs>,\
>> <page-size> ip=off init=/init'
>> U-boot> bootm <kernel_offset>
>>
>> Test2: update u-boot.img from kernel and re-boot
>> Kernel> flash_erase /dev/<mtdpart-of-u-boot> 0 0
>> Kernel> nandwrite -s 0 /dev/<mtdpart-of-u-boot> u-boot.img
>> Kernel> reboot
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pekon Gupta <pekon@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> Though I have done initial level of testing on AM335x as mentioned above,
> But will it be possible for you to test and confirm if these set of patches
> solve regressions on your OMAP3 boards ?
Those patches work fine on our custom AM335x board. So:
Tested-by: Stefan Roese <sr@xxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
