* Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> [131207 05:58]: > On Saturday 07 December 2013 14:48:20 Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 09:18:32AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Saturday 07 December 2013 01:00:27 Sebastian Reichel > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:27:25PM -0800, Tony Lindgren > wrote: > > > > > * Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx> [131206 13:37]: > > > > > > Nokia N900 DT boot breaks for me using 3.13-rc3. You > > > > > > can see the relevant kernel output below. Disabling > > > > > > the AES module in the omap3-n900.dts with status = > > > > > > "disabled" fixed the boot for me. > > > > > > > > > > OK thanks for letting me know. How about the following > > > > > patch to fix it? > > > > > > > > That's basically what I did to fix the problem. > > > > > > > > I guess the proper fix would be a runtime check if the > > > > device can be accessed (if that's possible). AFAIK it is > > > > possible to use the AES module on the N900 if the > > > > bootloader is slightly patched. > > > > > > > > Pali, can you elaborate more about this? I've seen, that > > > > you added a section about this on [0]. > > > > > > > > [0] http://elinux.org/N900#M-Shield > > > > > > > > -- Sebastian > > > > > > Yes, if you want to use M-Shield on Nokia N900, you need to > > > use new version of signed Nokia X-Loader which enable > > > M-Shield usage outside secure world. > > > > > > Because this updated X-Loader is not official and I think > > > nobody has it in n900, please disable using these M-Shield > > > crypto modules on n900. > > > > Is the updated X-Loader available somewhere? > > > > It was on mediafire server linked from this thread: > http://maemo.org/community/maemo-developers/n900_aes_and_sha1-md5_hw_acceleration_drivers/ > > Now it is deleted from that server, but I have copy on my HDD. Hmm OK let's hope there's some working link still around for those. It seems like we should eventually cover both options, but for the -rc cycle, we need to just disable those hardware modules in the .dtsi files. > > > Without patched updated X-Loader kernel will crash. > > > > That's what this thread is about :) It might be better to have > > a runtime check for the crypto hw's accessability by adding > > something like this to the driver's probe function: > > > > if (!aes_module_is_accessible()) { > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Usage of OMAP's AES module is > > blocked\n"); return -ENODEV; > > } > > > > That would require, that aes_module_is_accessible() can > > actually be implemented. > > > > You need to ask that question to somebody who has 1) access to > secure M-Shield documentation or 2) author who created that M- > Shield driver if your check is possible... I think we can check the configuration from the L3 registers. Looks like we no longer have those defined after purging the unused defines a while back, but I think the registers for the configuration are L3_PM_READ_PERMISSION etc registers. > > P.S.: I fixed the mail address of Aaro Koskinen. His nokia > > mail address doesn't work anymore. Oops sorry about that, I need to update my address book. Regards, Tohy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html