On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 08:16:51PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > As far as I know, embedded guys strong want to lowmem notification mecanism. I think the big server guys also want the same thing :) > At least, I and my mem_notify receive multiple contact from embedded > and JavaVM developer. > (include sun javavm engineer) > > In ideal, I think linux MM should care this requirement directly. I agree. > LSM and driver notifier is easy breakable because these component > deeply depend on MM. Agreed. > (eg, I developed /dev/mem_notify patch last year. but this patch don't > work on 2.6.28 because split-lru patch series totally changed MM > reclaim processing.) > > Unfortunately, we don't have any consensus of memory notification requirement. > various people have various requirement. so, if I can discuss it and > we get consensus, I'm glad. Care to work on your mem_notify patch again and bring it up to date? That would be a good place to start working from, right? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
