Op 14 jan 2009, om 14:41 heeft Tony Lindgren het volgende geschreven:
Hi all, I'll be merging in v2.6.29-rc1 soonish, and suggest that we make some changes to continue aligning our tree with the mainline tree. So I suggest: - We move the dspgateway code into a separate branch as discussed earlier. - We stop using source.mvista.com git tree, and only use the kernel.org git tree. There's no need for having two master trees, and kernel.org is the standard way to go. Big thanks to Monta Vista for hosting us for many years. - We reset arch/arm/mach-omap1 to be what's in the mainline and tag that patch again with "REMOVE OMAP LEGACY CODE" so it's easy to find later on. Naturally any code in that patch can be reworked so it can be integrated to the mainline kernel. - We add a clocks branch maintained by Paul Walmsley that's based off the mainline tree - We change the pm branch maintained by Kevin Hilman to be based on top of the mainline tree Comments and suggestions anybody?
Will there be some official 'staging' tree that pulls in trees like bridge, dss2, etc? I'm fine with pulling patches from this mailinglist, but a single source for gathering them would be nice.
Also, what's the medium and long term plan for the clocks and pm branch? regards, Koen
BTW, I've also re-cloned the omap tree on kernel.org as it had tons of old objects that we don't need. It should not affect local trees, but report problems here. It will take a while to get mirrored, and some branches might be missing until mirroring is done. I have also set up and empty for-next branch that will contain the reviewed patches for next merge window. This will also get pulled into Stephen Rothwell's linux next tree on daily basis. Regards, Tony --To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux- omap" inthe body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: Dit deel van het bericht is digitaal ondertekend
