On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Suresh Rajashekara <suresh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi List, > > We have been using 2.6.16-rc3-omap1 on one of our OMAP1 based product > which had quite a few bugs. We had been taking some fixes from the > later kernels and port it back, but at some point it becomes difficult > to do it when the basic data structures changes (because any such big > changes are frowned upon if proposed for a working product), but now, > finally we have decided to change the kernel itself to some later > version. I would appreciate if the list can suggest us some kernel > version to which we can switch to. Requirements are; > > 1. Kernel should be pretty stable (very less bugs) > 2. Even if there are any bugs, it should be easy to port the fixes > back. This is important because I don't get a chance to convince the > decision makers to change the kernel again because its something which > is very basic and they are afraid to change a working system for a > small bug fix. > > Some of the components for which we depend heavily on the kernel are > MTD/JFFS2 (with which we have faced lot of issues in > 2.6.16-rc3-omap1), DSP Gateway functionality and power management. > > Thanks in advance for your help. You should avoid rc* releases, those are release candidates, only for testing purposes. You should stick with plain -omap* releases, like 2.6.27-omap1, or 2.6.26-omap2, unless you want to be on the bleeding edge. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
