* David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> [081030 00:43]: > On Wednesday 29 October 2008, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Let's do the clean-up patches in two phases, one series that > > applies against the mainline kernel, then additional patches for > > linux-omap. Otherwise we'll never get out of this merge hell. > > Note that the patches I sent were in two phases ... but the > other way around. The OMAP-only patches can go in immediately, > and won't change anything of node. OK, thanks. > But since the ones that "also" apply against mainline remove > the legacy calls, they need to go later. If it were realistic > to merge them for 2.6.28, they could safely be pulled down IFF > the OMAP-only patches were already in the OMAP tree. Great, to me those look safe to merge. Can you Cc Russell on the arch/arm/*omap* patches if you merge them via gpiolib patches? Basically anything that will cause merge conflicts for omap-all should go via Russell so we don't frustrate him further, but I don't think these will cause an issue for him. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
