On Monday 06 October 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 01:19:18AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > ... > > > > (This is similar to the GPIO patch I just sent, but simpler > > except for the impact on the few drivers thinking oddly > > about IRQs. Those patches cover the key SIH modules, and > > a similar one affects the PIH in twl4030-core.) > > What are the dependencies for this patch ? It doesn't apply cleanly. Applies against current GIT with a few minor offsets caused by the patch working around the i2c-omap timeouts. I've sent that before; it's appended for reference. --- drivers/i2c/chips/twl4030-pwrirq.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/i2c/chips/twl4030-pwrirq.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/twl4030-pwrirq.c @@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ static int twl4030_pwrirq_thread(void *d return 0; } +#include <linux/delay.h> + static int __init twl4030_pwrirq_init(void) { int i, err; @@ -168,8 +170,16 @@ static int __init twl4030_pwrirq_init(vo twl4030_pwrirq_mask = 0xff; twl4030_pwrirq_pending_unmask = 0; +/* HEY: core already did this. + * But that's surely not why we + * sometimes see i2c timeouts here ... + */ +for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) { err = twl4030_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_INT, twl4030_pwrirq_mask, TWL4030_INT_PWR_IMR1); +if (!err) break; +msleep(10); +} if (err) return err; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html