Mans Rullgard <mans@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This increases VMALLOC_END to 0x18000000, making room for 256MB > RAM with the default 128MB vmalloc region. > > Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/vmalloc.h | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/vmalloc.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/vmalloc.h > index d8515cb..b97dfaf 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/vmalloc.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/vmalloc.h > @@ -17,5 +17,5 @@ > * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software > * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA > */ > -#define VMALLOC_END (PAGE_OFFSET + 0x17000000) > +#define VMALLOC_END (PAGE_OFFSET + 0x18000000) Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I have a similar patch locally, but the problem I currently have with it is that there is no longer any hole between vmalloc space and the beginning of IO space (the first virtual mappings start at 0xd8000000.) It's a bit unsafe, but IMO it's is probably OK for the short term. Longer term I think the virtual address space of the OMAP kernels needs to be reworked. It currenly just maps directly onto the physical address space, which makes the IO_ADDRESS() conversion macros simple, but leaves lots of wasted space in the virtual address space. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
