Hi Peter, I see your patch 68d7477caca19c0b52b5d4e85700cd3e6115577f created pwrirq.c as a separate file and thread. I'm wondering if there's any particular reason that "bank" of interrupts shouldn't be handled directly by twl4030-core, and even by the same IRQ handling thread. As it stands now the TWL "core" is not especially core-ish in this respect, and I'd like to see that be resolved (e.g. by a patch I'll probably write this afternoon) before this code goes to mainline ... - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
