On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:32:13PM +0530, Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 11:23 PM > > To: Gadiyar, Anand > > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: fix typo in omap_wdt.c > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 09:20:14PM +0530, Gadiyar, Anand wrote: > > > From: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@xxxxxx> > > > > > > Fix typo in omap_wdt.c introduced by a recent change > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@xxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c | 2 +- > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > Index: tony/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c > > > =================================================================== > > > --- tony.orig/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c 2008-09-25 > > 16:45:08.000000000 +0530 > > > +++ tony/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c 2008-09-26 > > 21:14:48.059042569 +0530 > > > @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int __init omap_wdt_probe(struct > > > } > > > > > > if (omap_wdt_dev) { > > > - ret - EBUSY; > > > + ret = -EBUSY; > > > goto err_busy; > > > } > > > > Those patches weren't applied to linux-omap yet, so this change should > > be melded into the patch that introduced it. It's better to > > resend that > > patch then to create a messed up bisect line. > > > > -- > > balbi > > Of course they were merged. I saw this warning when I compiled linux-omap, > when sending in that pin-muxing patch. You're right, at first look I thought this was for omap_hdq.c :-p Anyways, this patch should go also to Wim. Please send a copy of this patch to him so he can apply to his tree as well, btw, here's his mail: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx> -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
