* Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> [080924 11:03]: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [080924 10:12]: > > > * Arun KS <arunks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [080924 10:05]: > > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > How about introducing a new typedef in order to accommodate the > > > > > different size of enable_regs without ifdefs? > > > > > > > > > > I think that this is apparently the case categorized into (a) in > > > > > 'CodyingStyle'. > > > > > > > > I am not sure which is the right way to do. Is this what you meant? > > > > > > No, let's not do this. It should be void __iomem * for sure. Most of > > > the omap1 clock registers looks just fine for void __iomem *, let's > > > figure out which registers are broken. > > > > I've pushed a fix for this. Turns out I missed some conversions to > > void __iomem * while merging code from arm-devel branch. Fix also > > attached. > > Those registers should be u16 for OMAP2/3. OMAP1 needs something similar, > which will also get rid of those casts to void __iomem * - hacking on > something now ... Argh, sorry. Yeah it's an offset for omap2/3.. Will revert immediately. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
