On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 07:51 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 01 September 2008, stanley.miao wrote: > > + if(!is_sil_rev_less_than(OMAP3430_REV_ES2_0)) { > > But checkpatch.pl rejected that, yes? Fixed in a later > version I see. It has been fixed in a later version. > > ... and in "static int sdp2430_panel_enable(...)" this would > seem to be wrong. But for that matter, lcd_2430sdp.c should > not be relevant for any 3430 board anyway... this was shared between two boards. > > If that file is, oddly, being shared between two boards ... > then put that code in the "if (machine_is_omap_3430sdp())" > block. And someone should consider renaming the file if > it's not specific to the 2430 SDP. OMAP3430_ES1 doesn't have this problem. Stanley. > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html