Re: git-pull-request for omap2-upstream branch for next merge window (Was: [PATCH 00/16] Omap2 patches for post 2.6.26)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 02:28:14PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> 
> > That's not all black or white.  Many people have branches which are 
> > rebased all the time, especially when those branches are made up of 
> > other evolving branches.  I Think this is the case of your devel branch 
> > which sounds pretty fine to me.  As long as the volatile nature of such 
> > branch is clearly advertised and people are told not to base their own 
> > work on of course, and I think you did so many times now.
> 
> And I've just seen the commit message of the top commit in the devel 
> branch.  :-)  If that is not effective then I don't know what might be.

Well, the theory is that it'll appear in any pull requests generated
by git-request-pull, and of course everyone reads the output of that
command before they mail it, don't they?  ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux