* Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@xxxxxxxxx> [080818 20:21]: > Hi Vijay, > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Pasam, Vijay <vpasam@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Hiroshi, > > > >> Yes, "dspgateway" won't support OMAP3 but if I remember > >> correctly that TWL is already in OMAP2? and also does Camera > >> use the same mechanism of this MMU? This may be benefit or a > >> must, I guess.. > > > > I agree. If we are certain that camera driver or some other driver uses > > MMU the same way bridge does and the MMU architecture is the same, it > > makes sense to make this generic code. My point is that if DSPGateway > > doesn't use TWL, it will not benefit from using the Bridge MMU code > > which has TWL enabled. > > > > I think recently some one from TI posted OMAP3 camera driver at > linux-v4l2 mailing list and which I think was using camera MMU, but > not the common MMU framework it seems from the description. They > should first start converting to the common MMU infrastructure then. > > http://lists-archives.org/video4linux/23215-omap3-camera-driver.html We must make the MMU framework generic for the coprocessors, otherwise maintenance will be a nightmare and the code will never get merged upstream. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
