Hi Tony, On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > * Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> [080816 12:58]: >> Hi Vijay, >> >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Pasam, Vijay <vpasam@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I'm not familiar with checkpatch, but I guess the purpose is >> >> not to highlight functional issues. >> >> >> >> However, there are functional issues, but it makes sense to >> >> cleanup the code first: there's no point in analyzing code >> >> that is never used. >> > >> > There are about 9 errors with the latest set of patches. These are all >> > false positives - not really errors. Majority of warnings also fall >> > under this category. >> >> I'm not talking about issues returned by checkpatch, but issues >> visible to the human observer. > > And the two pieces of code that need to be fixed for Linux ASAP > for DSP are: > > - External device MMU hardware > - Mailbox handling > > This code needs to be shared for dsp[bios|bridge|gateway|link]. > And it can be also used for any other devices and coprocessors > needing MMU handling. > This task was pointed out on todo checklist created offline by Doyu-San during early discussion. -- ---Trilok Soni http://triloksoni.wordpress.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
