Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 12:55 +0300, Högander Jouni wrote: > >> Using them both would also generate more complexity. What would be the >> benefit in using them both? > > The RTC should be used during suspend since it's supposed to keep track > of time regardless of how long the duration of the suspension is. > > The 32kHz alone is not a good generic solution since it overflows after > a couple of days. Yes you are right on that timer overflow. How generic this is, I'm not sure. This is only for measuring time pwrdms spent in their states on suspend. How about removing that time from pm debug interfaces? They are meant for debugging dynamic sleep anyway. -- Jouni Högander -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
