"ext Paul Walmsley" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hello Jouni, > > a couple of questions about these patches.... > > On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Jouni Hogander wrote: > >> With this patch cpuidle boot problem with cpuidle doesn't exist. Also hang on wake-up seems to >> disappear (haven't seen this far). >> >> Main points in this patch are: >> 1. Add wkdep between neon and mpu >> 2. Add wkdep between per and core > > Could you explain a little further why PER would have a wakeup dependency > on CORE? Is this something that we should only enable under certain > conditions, e.g., latency requirements for a device in PER? This is done to make sure we don't loose any gpio interrupts: GPIO wakeup/interrupt doesn't work for GPIOs in PER domain if PER is not active. > >> 3. Deny hwsup mode before writing next pwrst state > > I missed this part of the patch - could you point me at that > section? Patch changes code to use set_pwrdm_state from pm34xx.c instead of pwrdm_set_next_pwrst from powerdomain code. That function contains denying hwsup mode. > > > regards, > > - Paul > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- Jouni Högander -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
