Re: musb bogosity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 06:21:09PM +0900, ext Paul Mundt wrote:
> Yes, that fixes that problem at least, thanks.

Cool :-)

> Now the I/O bits are the only outstanding issue, as I still need the
> CONFIG_SUPERH test in musb_io.h to get around conflicting definitions.

I think we're gonna need that for a while, can you send a proper patch
changing that ifndef ??

Feel free to put my Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx> if
you wish.

> Presently ARM and SH are the only ones that define the readsl() variants
> anyways, so stubbing in an extra ifdef there is fine as a temporary
> measure, but it's not a long-term solution. The only reason SH defines
> them at all is because we ran in to this exact same problem the last time
> an ARM driver tried passing itself off as generic ;-)

eheh... But this actually is a generic driver, we're only missing a pci
bus glue to use the musb chip on the opt cards, that would be really
nice :-)

-- 
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux