Hi Kevin, > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 4:52 AM > To: Syed Mohammed, Khasim > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Adding OMAP3 EVM support > > Minor cosmetic suggestion... > > As new files are added, can we please leave out full path to the file > in the file header? Not only is this unnecessary clutter, after a > short amount of time, these are usually wrong as files get renamed, > reorganized etc. and the paths rarely get updated. > > It's best to just leave them out. > Will consider this, but sometimes it is also better to have complete path, especially when I pass complete file to some one, I don't have to give path names separately, and they can just get this info from file header. But as you said, it has to be maintained properly :) Do you think we should also consider removing the last line in this paragraph from the GPL header, * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your * option) any later version. * "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." Any later version will add GPL version 3 to the list. Any thoughts on this? Regards, Khasim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
