> > > > In that variant I just added a load_start() function in addition to the > > load function and converted all the in tree callers to use this as they > > all called load() then start() in order anyway. This left the API > > behavior the same but optimized all current users. > > Can you send a patch against l-o tree for the load_start()? That might > be optimized enough :) Sure, I'll see about it hopefully tomorrow. Regards, Richard W. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
