Re: Build failure on armhf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> What is the problem you are trying to solve?

I guess he wants to build on that platform.

Adding the numbers to syscall.c is also only needed if the necessary
syscall numbers are missing in asm/unistd.h. It really was originally
only for ancient distributions where the headers predate numa support.
So updating that may also help.

If your headers don't have numa support at all it may be also possible
that the platform simply doesn't support NUMA. In that case building
numactl is pointless.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Devices]

  Powered by Linux