On 05/04/2015 04:29 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi Rick, > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina > <zerochaos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I apologize if this is already handled, however, a quick google search >> didn't help me find any version control systems so I'm submitting here. > > The numactl sources have been recently uploaded to this git repository: > https://github.com/numactl/numactl > >> In Gentoo we got a bug, where numactl fails tests if it isn't already >> installed: >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502586 >> >> ./bind_range: line 92: numactl: command not found >> ./bind_range: line 93: numactl: command not found >> >> The origin is fairly trivial, it appears that on the noted lines it's >> calling "numactl" instead of "../numactl" like it should. Which means >> it will try to use an installed numactl (possibly older) and fail if it >> isn't installed at all. > > Yes, this was fixed in this commit: > https://github.com/numactl/numactl/commit/25c052affbbcd2df0f67376d18d3ac4028326175 > > It's more general, as it adds the build directory to $PATH and it also > works when an out-of-tree build is used. > > May I suggest that you upgrade to the latest 2.0.10 which does contain this fix? 2.0.10 has a bug related to gentoo which I haven't figured out yet (doesn't appear to be upstream related afaict so far so don't worry about it) so when I saw the same call to numactl in both I assumed the bug was still there. Glad it's fixed, thanks for the work :-) -Zero_Chaos
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
