On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Andres Nötzli <noetzli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am experiencing a weird problem. When using numa_alloc_onnode repeatedly to allocate memory, it does not allocate memory on the node passed as an argument. > > Sample code: > #include <numa.h> > #include <numaif.h> > #include <iostream> > using namespace std; > > void find_memory_node_for_addr(void* ptr) { > int numa_node = -1; > if(get_mempolicy(&numa_node, NULL, 0, ptr, MPOL_F_NODE | MPOL_F_ADDR) < 0) > cout << "WARNING: get_mempolicy failed" << endl; > cout << numa_node << endl; > } > > int main() { > int64_t* x; > int64_t n = 5000; > //numa_set_preferred(1); > > numa_run_on_node(2); > for(int i = 0; i < 20; i++) { > size_t s = n * sizeof(int64_t); > x = (int64_t*)numa_alloc_onnode(s, 1); > for(int j = 0; j < n; j++) > x[j] = j + i; > find_memory_node_for_addr(x); > } > > return 0; > } > > Output: > 1 > 1 > 1 > 2 > 1 > 2 > 1 > 2 > 1 > 2 > 1 > 2 > 1 > 2 > 1 > 2 > 1 > 2 > 1 > 2 > > When uncommenting the line "numa_set_preferred(1);”, the output is all 1s as expected. Am I doing something wrong? Have you seen similar issues? > > I am running Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS: > $ cat /proc/version > Linux version 3.2.0-29-generic (buildd@allspice) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ) #46-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 27 17:03:23 UTC 2012 > > I am using libnuma 2.0.10 but I’ve had the same problem with 2.0.8~rc3-1. > > Thank you very much, > Andres > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Hi Andres Can you try to use strict policy by calling numa_set_strict? If you comment out setting the preferred node, the default policy is in action (I assume you did no change it, not for the process, not system wide) which is preferred also. But here you set preferred to a specific node and manual says, the default for process is to allocate on the node it runs. So I wonder what is the cpu affinity for this process looks like... Also maybe just to confirm you can check the policy from within your running code? Can you also post the machine NUMA config? -- Elena -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html