Re: numactl problems with -C option specifying cpus outside of cpus_allowed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 03 Oct 2013, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:34:01PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > It seems that the check for processors specified with C is always done
> > > regardless of CAP_SYS_NICE or the possibility that root may be calling
> > > numactl.
> > >
> > > taskset does not have that problem. Nor did releases of numactl before
> > > 2.0.8.
> >
> > The recently added --all option may help?
> 
> Which version added --all? Would the correct approach not be to check if
> its root runninng numactl or if CAP_SYS_NICE is set?

--all option was added in version 2.0.9-rc5. When CAP_SYS_NICE is not set,
numactl will fail in sched_setaffinity() call even so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Devices]

  Powered by Linux