On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 19:45 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> Let's have an example here.
>
> sched_init_numa()
> {
> ...
> // A loop set sched_domains_numa_levels to level.-------------1
>
> // I set sched_domains_numa_levels to 0.
> sched_domains_numa_levels = 0;--------------------------------2
Ah, ok, so this 'idiot in a hurry' (aka. me) placed the hunk wrong and
thought it was at the start of the function.
> // A loop allocating memory for sched_domains_numa_masks[][]
> for (i = 0; i < level; i++) {
> ......
> // Allocate memory for sched_domains_numa_masks[i]----3
> ......
> }
> ......
>
> // I reset sched_domains_numa_levels to level.
> sched_domains_numa_levels = level;----------------------------4
> }
Yes this makes sense, it might be best to have this as a separate patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
