On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 11:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 24 May 2010 10:41:52 -0400 > Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 10:12 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 May 2010 10:09:32 EDT, Lee Schermerhorn said: > > > > > > > > You asked about the fix3 patch [offlist] on Wednesday, 19May. Do you > > > > have that one in your tree? > > > > > > numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id-fix3.patch > > > was in -mmotm0521. > > > > Right. But, Andrew needs: > > numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix3 -- > > i.e., a fix to the 2nd patch of the percpu numa_*_id patch series. > > > > blah. > > I have a > numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix1.patch > and a fix3. Was there ever a fix2? Yes. Here's a link to it in your 5/21 mmotm series: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix2.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
