Hello, On 03/05/2010 02:07 AM, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > To use the generic percpu infrastructure for the numa_node_id() interface, > defined in linux/topology.h, we need to break the circular header dependency > that results from including <linux/percpu.h> in <linux/topology.h>. The > circular dependency: > > percpu.h -> slab.h -> gfp.h -> topology.h > > percpu.h includes slab.h to obtain the definition of kzalloc()/kfree() for > inlining __alloc_percpu() and free_percpu() in !SMP configurations. One could > un-inline these functions in the !SMP case, but a large number of files depend > on percpu.h to include slab.h. Tejun Heo suggested moving the definitions to > percpu-defs.h and requested that this be separated from the remainder of the > generic percpu numa_node_id() preparation patch. Hmmm... I think uninlining !SMP case would be much cleaner. Sorry that you had to do it twice. I'll break the dependency in the percpu devel branch and let you know. For other patches, except for what Christoph has already pointed out, everything looks good to me. Thank you. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
