Re: [PATCH 3/6] hugetlb: introduce alloc_nodemask_of_node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:

> alloc_nodemask_of_node() has no callers, so I can think of a good fix
> for these problems.  If it _did_ have a caller then I might ask "can't
> we fix this by moving alloc_nodemask_of_node() into the .c file".  But
> it doesn't so I can't.
> 

It gets a caller in patch 5 of the series in set_max_huge_pages().

My early criticism of both alloc_nodemask_of_node() and 
alloc_nodemask_of_mempolicy() was that for small CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT (say, 
6 or less, which covers all defconfigs except ia64), it is perfectly 
reasonable to allocate 64 bytes on the stack in the caller.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Devices]

  Powered by Linux