Re: [PATCH 4/4] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
> David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew, Lee, what's the status of this patchset?
> 
> All forgotten about as far as I'm concerned.  It was v1, it had "rfc"
> in there and had an "Ick, no, please don't do that" from Greg.  I
> assume Greg's OK with the fixed-up version.
> 
> 

I think Greg's concerns were addressed in the latest revision of the 
patchset, specifically http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=124906676520398.

Maybe the more appropriate question to ask is if Mel has any concerns 
about adding the per-node hstate attributes either as a substitution or as 
a complement to the mempolicy-based allocation approach.  Mel?

Lee, do you have plans to resend the patchset including the modified kobj 
handling?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Devices]

  Powered by Linux