> It looks like this behaviour was in the original implementation to my eye. > It does indeed seem to prefer taking all it can from one node before moving > on to the next. Your change seems reasonable to my eye though it may be > worth asking Andi if it was intended. The intent of this change seems > to bring the behaviour into line with that of alloc_fresh_huge_page() > used for orders less than MAX_ORDER. I don't remember intending it this way. The intention was always standard round robin one by one. If it didn't do that it wasn't extended. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
