Am Fr, 29.05.2009, 18:36, schrieb Andi Kleen: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:18:44PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: >> Am Fr, 29.05.2009, 17:01, schrieb Andi Kleen: >> > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:54:06AM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote: >> >> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Max Laier wrote: >> I guess the question is, what is special about my allocation in KVM as > > Define "in KVM"? > > Inside the guest? No, inside the host /for/ the guest. See the mail that started this thread. What I'm trying to do is to pin page allocations for a VM to a (set of) node(s). >> opposed to the allocation in the test module (that works as expected). > > I thought you complained that the test module didn't increase the numastat > counters as expected? No, the test module is fine. The exact same call in the KVM allocation routine, however, does not work. Again, please see my initial post. -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@xxxxxxxxxxx \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
