Re: [PATCH 6/10] Mempolicy man pages: document mode flags for mbind()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 15:35 +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Lee,
> 
> Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> > Add [minimal?] discussion of mode flags to mbind(2).
> 
> I can make the changes required below, if you'd just clarify/ACK.
> 
> > Signed-off-by:  Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@xxxxxx>
> > 
> >  man2/mbind.2 |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Index: man-pages-3.05/man2/mbind.2
> > ===================================================================
> > --- man-pages-3.05.orig/man2/mbind.2	2008-07-29 16:52:23.000000000 -0400
> > +++ man-pages-3.05/man2/mbind.2	2008-07-29 16:53:48.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -120,6 +120,30 @@ require the caller to specify via the
> >  argument,
> >  the node or nodes to which the mode applies.
> >  
> > +The
> > +.I mode
> > +argument may also include an optional
> > +.IR "mode flag ".
> > +The supported
> > +.I "mode flags"
> > +are:
> > +.TP
> > +.B MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES
> 
> Kernel 2.6.26, right?

Yes.

> 
> > +A non-empty
> > +.I nodemask
> > +specifies physical node ids.
> > +Linux does will not remap the
> > +.I nodemask
> > +when the task moves to a different cpuset context,
> 
> task?  --> thread/ process.

Discussed this in response to previous comments.  I'd prefer 'process'
with a note that cpusets can be per thread.

> 
> > +nor when the set of nodes allowed by the task's
> 
> See previous.
> 
> > +current cpuset context changes.
> > +.TP
> > +.B MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES
> 
> Kernel 2.6.26, right?

Yes.

> 
> > +A non-empty
> > +.I nodemask
> > +specifies node ids that are relative to the set of
> > +node ids allowed  by the task's current cpuset.
> 
> task?  --> thread/ process.
> 
> > +.PP
> >  .I nodemask
> >  points to a bitmask of nodes containing up to
> >  .I maxnode
> > @@ -139,11 +163,24 @@ is zero,
> >  the
> >  .I nodemask
> >  argument is ignored.
> > +
> >  Where a
> >  .I nodemask
> >  is required, it must contain at least one node that is on-line,
> > -allowed by the process' current cpuset context,
> > +allowed by the task's current cpuset context
> > +[unless the
> > +.B MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES
> > +mode flag is specified],
> >  and contains memory.
> > +If the
> > +.B MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES
> > +is set in
> > +.I mode
> > +and a required
> > +.I nodemask
> > +contains no nodes that are allowed by the task's current cpuset context,
> > +the memory policy reverts to
> > +.IR "local allocation" .
> >  The
> >  .B MPOL_DEFAULT
> > @@ -319,6 +356,12 @@ Or, none of the node IDs specified by
> >  .I nodemask
> >  are on-line and allowed by the process' current cpuset context,
> >  or none of the specified nodes contain memory.
> > +Or, the
> > +.I mode
> > +argument specified both
> > +.B MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES
> > +and
> > +.BR MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES .
> >  .TP
> >  .B EIO
> >  .B MPOL_MF_STRICT
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Michael
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Devices]

  Powered by Linux