Re: [PATCH 9/10] numactl/libnuma - fix checkaffinity regression test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/10] numactl/libnuma - fix checkaffinity regression test
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Cliff Wickman <cpw@xxxxxxx>, linux-numa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, eric.whitney@xxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080402183519.6134.22070.sendpatchset@localhost>
References: <20080402183425.6134.20979.sendpatchset@localhost> <20080402183519.6134.22070.sendpatchset@localhost>

9/10 and 10/10 are the same?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-numa" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 9/10] numactl/libnuma - fix checkaffinity regression test
  - From: Lee Schermerhorn

References:
- [PATCH 0/10] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup
  - From: Lee Schermerhorn
- [PATCH 9/10] numactl/libnuma - fix checkaffinity regression test
  - From: Lee Schermerhorn

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/10] numactl/libnuma - fix checktopology regression test
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 9/10] numactl/libnuma - fix checkaffinity regression test
Previous by thread: [PATCH 9/10] numactl/libnuma - fix checkaffinity regression test
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 9/10] numactl/libnuma - fix checkaffinity regression test
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Devices]

Powered by Linux