On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 4:20 AM Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 3:53 AM syzbot > <syzbot+c48f1971ba117125f94c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > syzbot found the following issue on: > > > > HEAD commit: 6bfd2d442af5 Merge tag 'irq-core-2024-05-12' of git://git... > > git tree: upstream > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13aefc20980000 > > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=395546166dcfe360 > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c48f1971ba117125f94c > > compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40 > > userspace arch: i386 > > > > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet. > > > > Downloadable assets: > > disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-6bfd2d44.raw.xz > > vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7ad901fe99c6/vmlinux-6bfd2d44.xz > > kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8d6ef2df621f/bzImage-6bfd2d44.xz > > > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: > > Reported-by: syzbot+c48f1971ba117125f94c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > ====================================================== > > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > > 6.9.0-syzkaller-01893-g6bfd2d442af5 #0 Not tainted > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > kswapd0/111 is trying to acquire lock: > > ffff888018e7e610 (sb_internal#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: nilfs_evict_inode+0x157/0x550 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:924 > > > > but task is already holding lock: > > ffffffff8d9390c0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x166/0x1a10 mm/vmscan.c:6782 > > > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > > > > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > > > -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: > > __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3698 [inline] > > fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3712 > > might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:312 [inline] > > prepare_alloc_pages.constprop.0+0x155/0x560 mm/page_alloc.c:4346 > > __alloc_pages+0x194/0x2460 mm/page_alloc.c:4564 > > alloc_pages_mpol+0x275/0x610 mm/mempolicy.c:2264 > > folio_alloc+0x1e/0x40 mm/mempolicy.c:2342 > > filemap_alloc_folio+0x3ba/0x490 mm/filemap.c:984 > > __filemap_get_folio+0x527/0xa90 mm/filemap.c:1926 > > pagecache_get_page+0x2c/0x260 mm/folio-compat.c:93 > > block_write_begin+0x38/0x4a0 fs/buffer.c:2209 > > nilfs_write_begin+0x9f/0x1a0 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:262 > > page_symlink+0x356/0x450 fs/namei.c:5236 > > nilfs_symlink+0x23c/0x3c0 fs/nilfs2/namei.c:153 > > vfs_symlink fs/namei.c:4489 [inline] > > vfs_symlink+0x3e8/0x630 fs/namei.c:4473 > > do_symlinkat+0x263/0x310 fs/namei.c:4515 > > __do_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4536 [inline] > > __se_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4534 [inline] > > __ia32_sys_symlink+0x78/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4534 > > do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline] > > __do_fast_syscall_32+0x75/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386 > > do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 > > entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e > > > > -> #1 (&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem){++++}-{3:3}: > > down_read+0x9a/0x330 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526 > > nilfs_transaction_begin+0x326/0xa40 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:223 > > nilfs_symlink+0x114/0x3c0 fs/nilfs2/namei.c:140 > > vfs_symlink fs/namei.c:4489 [inline] > > vfs_symlink+0x3e8/0x630 fs/namei.c:4473 > > do_symlinkat+0x263/0x310 fs/namei.c:4515 > > __do_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4536 [inline] > > __se_sys_symlink fs/namei.c:4534 [inline] > > __ia32_sys_symlink+0x78/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4534 > > do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline] > > __do_fast_syscall_32+0x75/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386 > > do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411 > > entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e > > > > -> #0 (sb_internal#4){.+.+}-{0:0}: > > check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] > > check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] > > validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] > > __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 > > lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline] > > lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719 > > percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] > > __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1661 [inline] > > sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1844 [inline] > > nilfs_transaction_begin+0x21b/0xa40 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:220 > > nilfs_evict_inode+0x157/0x550 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:924 > > evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667 > > iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline] > > iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767 > > iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757 > > dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x440 fs/dcache.c:400 > > __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603 > > shrink_kill fs/dcache.c:1048 [inline] > > shrink_dentry_list+0x140/0x5d0 fs/dcache.c:1075 > > prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1156 > > super_cache_scan+0x32a/0x550 fs/super.c:221 > > do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435 > > shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline] > > shrink_slab+0xa87/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:626 > > shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4774 > > shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4835 [inline] > > lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4935 > > shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5894 [inline] > > kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6704 [inline] > > balance_pgdat+0x10d1/0x1a10 mm/vmscan.c:6895 > > kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7164 > > kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388 > > ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 > > ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 > > > > other info that might help us debug this: > > > > Chain exists of: > > sb_internal#4 --> &nilfs->ns_segctor_sem --> fs_reclaim > > > > Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > > > CPU0 CPU1 > > ---- ---- > > lock(fs_reclaim); > > lock(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem); > > lock(fs_reclaim); > > rlock(sb_internal#4); > > > > *** DEADLOCK *** > > > > 2 locks held by kswapd0/111: > > #0: ffffffff8d9390c0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x166/0x1a10 mm/vmscan.c:6782 > > #1: ffff888018e7e0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#74){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:561 [inline] > > #1: ffff888018e7e0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#74){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x96/0x550 fs/super.c:196 > > > > stack backtrace: > > CPU: 2 PID: 111 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.9.0-syzkaller-01893-g6bfd2d442af5 #0 > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 > > Call Trace: > > <TASK> > > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] > > dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114 > > check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 > > check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] > > check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] > > validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline] > > __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 > > lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline] > > lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719 > > percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] > > __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1661 [inline] > > sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1844 [inline] > > nilfs_transaction_begin+0x21b/0xa40 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:220 > > nilfs_evict_inode+0x157/0x550 fs/nilfs2/inode.c:924 > > evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667 > > iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline] > > iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767 > > iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757 > > dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x440 fs/dcache.c:400 > > __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603 > > shrink_kill fs/dcache.c:1048 [inline] > > shrink_dentry_list+0x140/0x5d0 fs/dcache.c:1075 > > prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1156 > > super_cache_scan+0x32a/0x550 fs/super.c:221 > > do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435 > > shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline] > > shrink_slab+0xa87/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:626 > > shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4774 > > shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4835 [inline] > > lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4935 > > shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5894 [inline] > > kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6704 [inline] > > balance_pgdat+0x10d1/0x1a10 mm/vmscan.c:6895 > > kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7164 > > kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:388 > > ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 > > ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 > > </TASK> > > > > > > --- > > This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. > > See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. > > syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > > > > syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: > > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. > > > > If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with: > > #syz fix: exact-commit-title > > > > If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with: > > #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem > > (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard) > > > > If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with: > > #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report > > > > If you want to undo deduplication, reply with: > > #syz undup > > Similarly, it seems to have the same root as the report below, but I > can't confirm it right now, so I'll leave it now. > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ca73f5a22aec76875d85 > > Similarly, the GFP flags on the symlink's page cache allocation > appears to be causing this circular lock dependency. > > Ryusuke Konishi #syz dup: possible deadlock in nilfs_transaction_begin Ryusuke Konishi
