On 03/29/2018 08:42 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Simplify the locking by taking the spinlock while we walk the tree on
> the assumption that many acquires and releases of the lock will be
> worse than holding the lock for a (potentially) long time.
I see this change made in several of the patches and do not have a
specific issue with it. As part of the XArray implementation you
have XA_CHECK_SCHED = 4096. So, we drop locks and do a cond_resched
after XA_CHECK_SCHED iterations. Just curious how you came up with
that number. Apologies in advance if this was discussed in a previous
round of reviews.
>
> We could replicate the same locking behaviour with the xarray, but would
> have to be careful that the xa_node wasn't RCU-freed under us before we
> took the lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I did not do a detailed review of the XArray implementation. Only looked
at the provided interfaces and their intended uses. If the interfaces work
as specified, the changes here are fine.
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Mike Kravetz
> ---
> mm/memfd.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c
> index 4cf7401cb09c..3b299d72df78 100644
> --- a/mm/memfd.c
> +++ b/mm/memfd.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> #include <uapi/linux/memfd.h>
>
> /*
> - * We need a tag: a new tag would expand every radix_tree_node by 8 bytes,
> + * We need a tag: a new tag would expand every xa_node by 8 bytes,
> * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on shmem.
> */
> #define SHMEM_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE
> @@ -29,35 +29,28 @@
>
> static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping)
> {
> - struct radix_tree_iter iter;
> - void __rcu **slot;
> - pgoff_t start;
> + XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, 0);
> struct page *page;
> + unsigned int tagged = 0;
>
> lru_add_drain();
> - start = 0;
> - rcu_read_lock();
> -
> - radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->i_pages, &iter, start) {
> - page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot);
> - if (!page || radix_tree_exception(page)) {
> - if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) {
> - slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter);
> - continue;
> - }
> - } else if (page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) > 1) {
> - xa_lock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
> - radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->i_pages, iter.index,
> - SHMEM_TAG_PINNED);
> - xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
> - }
>
> - if (need_resched()) {
> - slot = radix_tree_iter_resume(slot, &iter);
> - cond_resched_rcu();
> - }
> + xas_lock_irq(&xas);
> + xas_for_each(&xas, page, ULONG_MAX) {
> + if (xa_is_value(page))
> + continue;
> + if (page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) > 1)
> + xas_set_tag(&xas, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED);
> +
> + if (++tagged % XA_CHECK_SCHED)
> + continue;
> +
> + xas_pause(&xas);
> + xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
> + cond_resched();
> + xas_lock_irq(&xas);
> }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
> }
>
> /*
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
