Re: Bug with future timestamp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:54:32 -0400, Jérôme Poulin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Michele Marcon
> <M.Marcon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> When the garbage collector starts, it will notice that the checkpoint "from the future" is protected and will not remove it.
>> The problem is that it will not remove subsequent checkpoints (but with timestamp that shouldn't be protected), and therefore there won't be any garbage collection until 2020.
>>
>> The only workaround is to manually remove the "future" checkpoints with rmcp.
>>
>> Is this a known issue? Thanks!
> 
> 
> I was bit by the opposite problem on my day to day laptop. I set my
> time in the past for some hours, then after restoring the correct
> time, the garbage collector destroyed all the checkpoints from the
> past. At this point, the FS was screwed. I reported the issue and
> can't find the patch that fixed it but I guess this is the kind of
> protection to be expected from my issue, checkpoints from the future
> can't be cleaned up.
> 
> Pseudo-References:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nilfs/msg00592.html

Do you mean an fs curruption occurs (even now) after the above rewinding ?

If you mean all checkpoints looks to be removed, could you try "-a"
option of the lscp command ?

Regards,
Ryusuke Konishi

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux CIFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux