Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] nilfs2: add nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo to update segment usage info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:00:29 +0100, Andreas Rohner wrote:
> This patch introduces the nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo function, which
> expects an array of nilfs_suinfo_update structures and updates the
> segment usage information accordingly.
> 
> This is basically a helper function for the newly introduced
> NILFS_IOCTL_SET_SUINFO ioctl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rohner <andreas.rohner@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nilfs2/sufile.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/nilfs2/sufile.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/sufile.c b/fs/nilfs2/sufile.c
> index 3127e9f..81c3438 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/sufile.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/sufile.c
> @@ -870,6 +870,97 @@ ssize_t nilfs_sufile_get_suinfo(struct inode *sufile, __u64 segnum, void *buf,
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo -

Please fill the summary line of function even though
nilfs_sufile_get_suinfo() function lacks it.

 * nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo - update segment usage information

> + * @sufile: inode of segment usage file
> + * @buf: array of suinfo
> + * @supsz: byte size of suinfo
> + * @nsup: size of suinfo array
> + *
> + * Description: Takes an array of nilfs_suinfo_update structs and updates
> + * segment usage accordingly.
> + *
> + * Return Value: On success, 0 is returned and .... On error, one of the
> + * following negative error codes is returned.
> + *
> + * %-EIO - I/O error.
> + *
> + * %-ENOMEM - Insufficient amount of memory available.
> + *
> + * %-EINVAL - Invalid segment number in input
> + */
> +ssize_t nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo(struct inode *sufile, void *buf,
> +				unsigned supsz, size_t nsup)
> +{
> +	struct buffer_head *bh;
> +	struct nilfs_suinfo_update *sup, *supv = buf;
> +	struct nilfs_segment_usage *su;
> +	void *kaddr;
> +	unsigned long blkoff, prev_blkoff;
> +	size_t nerr = 0;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(nsup == 0))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	down_write(&NILFS_MDT(sufile)->mi_sem);
> +	for (sup = supv; sup < supv + nsup; sup++) {
> +		if (unlikely(sup->sup_segnum >=
> +				nilfs_sufile_get_nsegments(sufile))) {
> +			printk(KERN_WARNING
> +			       "%s: invalid segment number: %llu\n", __func__,
> +			       (unsigned long long)sup->sup_segnum);
> +			nerr++;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	if (nerr > 0) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out_sem;
> +	}

Seems that you can exit from inside the loop:

	for (sup = supv; sup < supv + nsup; sup++) {
		if (unlikely(sup->sup_segnum >=
				nilfs_sufile_get_nsegments(sufile))) {
			printk(KERN_WARNING
			       "%s: invalid segment number: %llu\n", __func__,
			       (unsigned long long)sup->sup_segnum);
			ret = -EINVAL;
			goto out_sem;
		}
	}

> +
> +	sup = supv;
> +	blkoff = nilfs_sufile_get_blkoff(sufile, sup->sup_segnum);
> +	ret = nilfs_mdt_get_block(sufile, blkoff, 1, NULL, &bh);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto out_sem;
> +
> +	for (;;) {
> +		kaddr = kmap_atomic(bh->b_page);
> +		su = nilfs_sufile_block_get_segment_usage(
> +			sufile, sup->sup_segnum, bh, kaddr);
> +
> +		if (nilfs_suinfo_update_lastmod(sup))
> +			su->su_lastmod = cpu_to_le64(sup->sup_sui.sui_lastmod);
> +
> +		if (nilfs_suinfo_update_nblocks(sup))
> +			su->su_nblocks = cpu_to_le32(sup->sup_sui.sui_nblocks);
> +
> +		if (nilfs_suinfo_update_flags(sup))
> +			su->su_flags = cpu_to_le32(sup->sup_sui.sui_flags);

You must also update the counter value of sh_ncleansegs, sh_ndirtysegs
in the nilfs_sufile_header struct of sufile header block based on the
change of these flags.

In addition, you should ignore NILFS_SEGMENT_USAGE_ACTIVE_FLAG as
below because this flag is a virtual flag set by running nilfs kernel
code.  The flag bit should not be written to sufile on disk.

          (sui_flags & ~(1UL << NILFS_SEGMENT_USAGE_ACTIVE))

> +
> +		kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> +
> +		if (++sup >= supv + nsup)

You must not use the automatic pointer operation of C language for
nilfs_suinfo_update because it may be extended in a future release.
This "++sup" breaks forward compatibility of the ioctl.

You should do this by:

                sup = (void *)sup + supsz;

Note that pointer type is automatically converted for "void *" type
variables.

> +			break;
> +		prev_blkoff = blkoff;
> +		blkoff = nilfs_sufile_get_blkoff(sufile, sup->sup_segnum);
> +		if (blkoff == prev_blkoff)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* get different block */

You must mark bh that this function changed as dirty with
mark_buffer_dirty(bh).  Otherwise, the change will be gone.


> +		brelse(bh);
> +		ret = nilfs_mdt_get_block(sufile, blkoff, 1, NULL, &bh);
> +		if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> +			goto out_sem;
> +	}
> +	brelse(bh);
> +

The sufile should be marked as dirty (if any change happened):

    nilfs_mdt_mark_dirty(sufile);

> + out_sem:
> +	up_write(&NILFS_MDT(sufile)->mi_sem);
> + out:
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * nilfs_sufile_read - read or get sufile inode
>   * @sb: super block instance
>   * @susize: size of a segment usage entry
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/sufile.h b/fs/nilfs2/sufile.h
> index e84bc5b..7aa9d3e 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/sufile.h
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/sufile.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ int nilfs_sufile_set_segment_usage(struct inode *sufile, __u64 segnum,
>  int nilfs_sufile_get_stat(struct inode *, struct nilfs_sustat *);
>  ssize_t nilfs_sufile_get_suinfo(struct inode *, __u64, void *, unsigned,
>  				size_t);
> -
> +ssize_t nilfs_sufile_set_suinfo(struct inode *, void *, unsigned , size_t);
>  int nilfs_sufile_updatev(struct inode *, __u64 *, size_t, int, size_t *,
>  			 void (*dofunc)(struct inode *, __u64,
>  					struct buffer_head *,
> -- 
> 1.8.5.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux CIFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux