Re: [PATCH] nilfs2: depending on flags, update segment usage instead of cleaning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ryusuke,

On 2014-01-19 17:49, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> Additional comments are as follows:
> 
> - For NILFS_IOCTL_SET_SUINFO, v_flags should be used to define which
>   fields (lastmod, nblocks, flags) are modified.  These flags should
>   be defined with bit masks.

I forgot to mention in my cover letter, that I decided not to use the
v_flags field for the flags, because I needed a new structure to contain
the segment number anyway. It just seemed to be a better choice to put
the flags there as well. But if you want I can always change it to use
the v_flags field.

Best regards,
Andreas Rohner
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux CIFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux