On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 11:37 +0100, Andreas Rohner wrote: > > I think that it really needs to test this patchset by xfstests and > > fsstress (part of LTP test suite) tools. What do you think? > > > > Moreover, I think that it makes sense to use well-known benchmark suite > > (or several) for testing and estimation. > > Yes you are right. I will try to use another benchmark. But it is hard > to use well-known benchmarks to test the GC, because they are designed > to test different things. Either not enough data is written and the GC > never starts or too much and the benchmark crashes with a "not enough > space left on the device" error. I don't know concrete reasons of such crashes. But namely efficient GC policy should resolve such issues, from my point of view. :) Usually, stable and mature file system should pass through xfstests and fsstress without any trouble. Namely, such success is our goal, I think. With the best regards, Vyacheslav Dubeyko. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
