On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 09:32 +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Thursday 17 January 2013 11:57:18 Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > [...] > > If you do so by the hands then, from my point of view, you know what you > > are doing. > > You asked for a way to easily reproduce it and now say it is my fault? Sry, > but it happened in a real world scenario and I only provided a testcase for > you. > No, I don't say that it is your fault. The timestamp policy of GC has some limitation and peculiarities because of nature of the time. So, you described one of such use-case. But, from my point of view, such use-case has very low probability of occurrence. And proper fix can be adding of another GC policy. That's all I said. With the best regards, Vyacheslav Dubeyko. > Kind regards, > Sven -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
